r51due

本篇paper代写- The international landscape is multipolar讨论了国际格局多极化。从目前的形势来看，美国可以完全不顾联合国宪章和国际法基本原则，任意对一个主权国家动用军事力量，对国际政治民主化发展形成根本威胁。不过从长远看，国际格局的多极化是不可逆转的历史潮流，这是经济全球化基本趋势所决定的。本篇paper代写由51due代写平台整理，供大家参考阅读。

Although the current trend of multi-polarization in the international pattern has suffered major setbacks, in the long run, the trend of world economic globalization determines the inevitable trend of multi-polarization and democratization in the international pattern.

From the current situation, the United States can completely regardless of the basic principles of the UN charter and international law, the arbitrary use of military force to a sovereign country, form a fundamental threat to international political democratization development, but in the long run, the globalization and democratization of international pattern is the irreversible historical trend, this is the basic trend of economic globalization.

The development of international political multi-polarization and democratization has always been one of China's basic foreign strategic principles. Therefore, the scientific judgment on the characteristics of international pattern has extremely important policy value, which is the basic premise of formulating foreign strategy. Domestic scholars' judgment of international pattern is mostly based on two factors. The second is the structure of relations between states, especially among the major powers, that is, the friendly, hostile, or allied, or non-aligned relations among states, while ignoring the most basic international social background. However, any examination of the international pattern cannot leave the background of the international society, such as the trend of The Times, values and levels of science and technology. Otherwise, the international pattern today is no different from China's warring states period or Europe in the 19th century.

World economic globalization is an objective historical development trend, if from Columbus discovered the new world, the global gradually integrated into an interdependent whole has there should be 500 years, the development trend of postwar revolution of science and technology and the development of world economy, of course, make this historical trend is more obvious, especially after the end of the cold war, speeding up the pace of globalization, has become an irresistible trend of history. Trend of globalization and its constitutes the background of current international society's most basic, it changes the human life, production and communication, and ways of thinking, so as to fundamentally change the landscape of human social civilization, it also makes the basic elements of international political position, function, function mode changing, and has produced many new situations and new problems. Therefore, it is necessary to take globalization as the basic background factor to study the current international pattern and its development trend.

"Pole" itself is a physical concept, referring to a magnetic center or force center, which was introduced into international politics by the western realist school to depict countries with dominant forces and influences in the international system. Theories of international politics in the United States master ・ o. there, judgment "pole" is the most important indicator of a country's military power, and military strength like money is the biggest convertible, that is to say, military strength powerful country in other non-military fields will also because of its powerful military strength and has a decisive influence. As a result, the traditional "pole" is based on the concept of hobbesian anarchy international order completely concept, on the basis of the relationship between the countries is the competition of pure power and even military power, is a completely "zero-sum game", seems to be no common ground between national concept, system, culture, rules, and did not depend on each other's existence. This concept of "pole" is based primarily on the dominance of military power and its infiltration of influence in all other areas, and emphasizes naked power politics and coercive control and monopoly over foreign or international affairs.

In the context of today's accelerated globalization process, the convertibility of military force has been greatly weakened. A country's superior military strength has been unable to smoothly translate into domination in other fields such as economy, culture, society and environment. For example, when it comes to positioning world oil prices, oil producers with weak military power have more influence and voice than big countries. In the era of globalization, the interests of countries are no longer zero-sum, but greatly overlapped, crossed and win-win. Wars or conflicts will lead to loss or even destruction of both sides, regions and even the whole world. Although the international community still does not have a central government-style ruling authority, due to the network proliferation of the international system and rule system, countries in today's world have also possessed considerable common concepts and rules. In particular, with the emergence of global problems and threats, it is impossible for any country to act entirely as it wishes. The most typical example is the terrorist threat. Although the United States has an overwhelming military strength, it cannot deal with the threat of terrorist organizations alone. Therefore, the connotation of "pole" has lost or weakened the dominant and controlling nature in the original sense. The traditional monopolar pattern concept, which is based on the dominant, controlled and monopolized status of a superior country, is fundamentally contrary to the logic of globalization.

One of the basic views of globalization supporters is the "erosion" of the power of nation-states. It is an undeniable fact in today's world that the number of actors outside nation-states increases and their functions are enhanced. Undoubtedly, an important result of globalization is the transfer and change of power at the domestic and international levels, which is mainly reflected in the following two aspects at the international level:

First, the transfer of power from sovereign states to non-state actors. Since the emergence of the modern international system, the nation-state has been the most basic and powerful actor in the international system, and the status and role of other actors in international politics is almost negligible. But since the 1980 s, the speeding up of globalization, the strengthening of interdependence among nations, the emergence of a global problem, and the functional sex of the government or non-government international organization and even some individuals, particularly the role of multinational companies, such as in international political, economic, more and more big, the national power of self-restraint and international organizations to functional transfer or assignment is inevitable. In modern times, the United Nations, the international monetary fund, the world trade organization, greenpeace, humanitarian organizations and other organizations are more widely and deeply involved in world affairs. The traditional transfer of state power to non-governmental organizations necessarily includes even the most powerful countries, which makes it difficult for any powerful country to monopolize decision-making power in world affairs and inevitably restricts any unipolar attempt.

Second, economic regionalization shifts power from individual countries to increasingly integrated regional groups. Economic regionalization is actually the integration that takes the lead in a specific space and time scope. It is an inevitable stage in the long process of economic globalization finally becoming integrated. Today's regionalization of the world is dominated by three major plates, namely, the north American free trade area, the European Union and the asia-pacific economic circle. On the one hand, regionalization has shifted some economic and political power from individual countries to regional groups. At the same time, it has also constructed the world economic multi-polarization pattern based on regional groups, which has become the support of political multi-polarization and provided a solid economic foundation for the development of political multi-polarization.

An important result of globalization is the emergence of global problems, such as ecological environment deterioration, financial crisis, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the spread of diseases such as AIDS and transnational crimes. These increasingly serious global problems not only transcend national boundaries, but also cause serious harm or even devastating consequences to the whole world, and they are beyond the capacity of any single country to solve them. Terrorism is typical of current global issues, because in essence, terrorist attacks are global economic interests in the uneven distribution in different parts of the world, and the overseas empire type caused by unfair policy, unilateralism, military force, the police, "pre-emptive", "forced entry" and other policies and measures, not only can not quell the anger, but also can make this kind of contradiction intensified. The developments since the war on terror prove that the unilateral hegemony of the United States and its absolute military superiority do not guarantee the security of the United States, and terrorist organizations will launch new attacks against the United States at any time. Military force is not an effective means of solving the problems of globalization, politics and diplomacy. Therefore, America's unilateralism and militarism policies and behaviors are in essence antithetical to the globalization background of today's world, and the globalization background is the inherent constraint of the United States in realizing its hegemony strategy.

The global problems caused by globalization are beyond any national boundaries and beyond the capacity of any individual country, regardless of their origin, role, impact and governance. In the increasingly serious and urgent problems and challenges, the ethnic equality, democratic consultation between the countries become the objective need and inevitable, multilateral joint action, based on the cooperation of the global public plan, and establish the corresponding international mechanism and system, became a appropriate way and means of global governance, and not rely on any one superpower command and ability. Therefore, the new international political order that is more equal and democratic based on the international system is the logical need and inevitable result of the globalization process.

Generally speaking, the emergence of pluralistic subjects and the strengthening of mutual dependence between countries caused by globalization will inevitably lead to the transfer and decentralization of power from countries, especially superpowers, which will inevitably weaken the monopoly power of any great power in international affairs and the ability to control other countries. In essence, globalization negates the trend of unipolarity. The development of multi-polarization and democratization in international politics is the inevitable logic of the trend of globalization. Therefore, although in the short term international political multi-polarization trend encountered some setbacks, hegemonism force more aggressively, and international political democratization trends have also been a certain degree of reversal, but in the history of this basic objective trend of economic globalization tide flow, the international trend of political multi-polarization and democratization will eventually dominate.

要想成绩好，英国论文得写好，51due代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯，专业辅导，还为你提供专业英国essay代写，paper代写，report代写，需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due工作客服QQ：800020041或者Wechat：Abby0900吧。