Paper代写：Anti-terrorism policy in the United States－r51due

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的paper代写范文- Anti-terrorism policy in the United States，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了美国的反恐政策。自从911事件之后，美国政府将反恐作为维护国家安全推行全球战略的头等大事来做，并先后发动了阿富汗战争、伊拉克战争。在此期间布什政府形成了一套相对完整的反恐战略思想，并不断完善和修订。自反恐战争开始以来，布什的反恐战略思想历经了三个发展阶段，最终成为布什主义的重要组成部分。

The US takes “9.11” event's victim globally to initiate a war on terror. The Bush Administration time, by the unilateralism becomes “the Bush doctrine” for chief feature's anti-terrorist policy the important component; After the Austria Pama comes on stage, has made the obvious adjustment to the anti-terrorist policy.

September 11, 2001, the terrorist attacks shocked the world, the Non-traditional security factors received universal attention, terrorism for the first time worldwide attention. The United States has underlined the international community's call for a war on terrorism. The international community preceded the "9.11" event with a multipolar character. In addition to the United States as a superpower, the development of other countries is very uneven. After that, the trend of multi-polarization in the international community has not changed, but it presents new features:

http://www.51due.net/writing/research-paper/sample31820.html

After the "9.11" incident, the United States government put counter-terrorism as a top priority for the global strategy of safeguarding national security and launched the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. During this time, the Bush administration formed a relatively complete strategy of counter-terrorism, and constantly improve and revise. Since the beginning of the War of terror, Bush's strategy of counter-terrorism has undergone three stages of development, and finally became an important part of the Bush doctrine.

At this stage, Bush's strategic thinking is "to establish a foreign policy with anti-terrorism lines, to establish a United States-led anti-terrorist coalition, to launch a retaliatory war on terror", under which the United States launched the war in Afghanistan. The Bush administration has made an initial confession to the outraged American people, while also showing the world that the US remains a leader. But after the end of the war, the fight against terrorism quickly lost its target, and sporadic terrorist groups did not deserve a war from the United States.

The second stage of anti-terrorism strategy is marked by the "axis of evil". January 29, 2002, Bush put forward the "axis of evil" theory, under the name of counter-terrorism to suppress the old enemy, counter-terrorism strategy began with foreign policy and national security policy combined. It not only marks the maturing of the American anti-terrorism strategy, but also marks the beginning of the "Bush Doctrine". However, the "axis of evil" only raises the scope and main targets of counter-terrorism, and does not propose specific strategies to achieve this goal.

The third stage of the strategy of counter-terrorism is characterized by "preemptive plus preventive intervention" strategy to replace the "threat plus containment" strategy, the establishment of the so-called "peace under the United States." This strategy not only refers to military strikes, but also includes assassinations, kidnappings, economic sanctions and other means. It put aside the norms of international relations, such as international law, the United Nations, and the universally recognized sovereign equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of the international community, making the United States counter-terrorism strategy more aggressive and proactive.

The Bush administration launched the Iraq War under the guidance of a maturing counter-terrorism strategy. In fact, the Iraq War has the name of counter-terrorism and no counter-terrorism, Iraq's oil and the export of democracy to the Middle East is the United States drunken. The "9.11" incident made the American political elites to render "the Bush Doctrine", advocating the so-called "neo-imperialism", these imperialist expansion policies will only make the contradictions more sharp.

Mr Obama embarked on an overhaul of counter-terrorism policy immediately after his inauguration. In his campaign, Mr. Obama has repeatedly pledged to withdraw all fighting troops from Iraq within 16 months, and to send more troops to the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan.

Mr Obama's troop withdrawal from Iraq is deeply responsible for the surge in Afghanistan. First, America's "democratic exports" have suffered setbacks in Iraq, and U.S. troops are mired in Iraq. The security situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated during the U.S. occupation of Iraq, and the Taliban have come a long time. At the same time, the domestic anti-war opinion pressure is enormous.

Since the "9.11" incident, the United States in the war on terrorism has two main lines, namely, Afghanistan and Iraq. The United States has easily overturned the so-called "terrorist government" of the two countries, but has been troubled by varying degrees of post-war reconstruction. The Obama administration has more room and time to adjust its counter-terrorism policies than the Bush administration.

After the "9.11" incident, Americans found that superpower status brought with it a variety of advantages while also bringing more security dilemmas. In this international situation, the Obama administration's counter-terrorism strategy bush the government's counter-terrorism strategy is obviously more meaningful. In the late Bush administration, the Middle East policy was strained by the Iraq war. Iraq has not only become a drag on U.S. counterterrorism policy, but also a stumbling block to East policy. Since the outbreak of the Iranian nuclear issue, relations between the United States and Iran have deteriorated sharply, while the Obama administration's restructured counter-terrorism strategy has greatly liberated East China's policy and made it more flexible.

Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan, the military occupation of the United States is a final solution, and no matter how American democracy is appropriate for both countries, it is a long process to build a national government.

To sum up, whether it is the Bush administration period with a strong "bush" color of counter-terrorism policy or the Obama administration's revised anti-terrorism policy, are subordinate to the United States Global Strategy to serve the U.S. internal and foreign affairs. The United States in the name of the war on terror to eradicate dissent, to recognize this can grasp the main line of U.S. foreign policy, clear the deep meaning of U.S. counter-terrorism policy.

想要了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要paper代写，请关注51Due英国论文代写平台，51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构，专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作，主要业务有论文代写、assignment代写、paper代写。在这里，51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务，为广大留学生提升写作水平，帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有paper代写需求，可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。