Paper代写：The relationship between literature and morality－r51due

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的paper代写范文- The relationship between literature and morality，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了文艺与道德的关系。文艺与道德的关系是对立统一的，二者相互影响，不可分割。文艺是人类社会所特有的精神现象，是人们的一种有目的、有意识的活动，是一种创造活动。而道德则是由一定的社会经济关系所决定的，以善恶评价为标准，依靠社会舆论、传统习惯所维系的行为规范的总和。

Historically, the controversy over the relationship between literature and ethics lasted for more than 2000 years, and many great thinkers and artists were involved in the controversy. Until now, the relationship between literature and morality has not been solved completely, it seems to be an unsolved problem. There are two kinds of viewpoints that occupy the mainstream of controversy, one is "the moral of literature and art", that is, art and morality are closely related; most scholars choose one of these ideas first, and then use various theories and arguments to prove the correctness of their doctrines. The two viewpoints of the relationship between literature and art and morality gradually become irreconcilable conflicts. The purpose of this paper is to try to find a more reasonable moral view of literature and art through simple analysis.

On the literary and moral views of Mr. Zhu Guangqian, there are generally two viewpoints in the academic circle: one is to recognize Zhu Guangqian's literary and moral view, and the relationship between literature and art is "moral influence without moral purpose"; There is also a kind of literary morality which does not support Zhu Guangqian, and thinks that Zhu Guangqian's viewpoints are vague, has not given a more clear relationship between literature and morality.

http://www.51due.net/writing/research-paper/sample31965.html

Scholars Schowen that in Zhu Guangqian's early aesthetic thought, there was no direct relationship between literature and morality. A large part of these views comes from the Croce view of the aesthetic. By the 50's, Zhu Guangqian's aesthetic thought had a great turn, which also wavered in the relationship between literature and morality. In the 11th chapter of literary psychology, Zhu Guangqian directly criticized Croce's aesthetic thoughts, when Zhu Guangqian's view of literature and art had shifted from the previous literary and artistic independence to the existence of some relationship between literature and art and morality, Zhu Guangqian began to attach importance to the relationship between literature and morality. Why? Schowen thinks Zhu Guangqian is essentially a person who is enthusiastic about social reform. His transformation of society, the first to transform the people, and the way to transform the people's hearts is precisely the function of the arts. But Zhu Guangqian hides a little deep.

In addition, Schowen also believes that although Zhu Guangqian's literary and moral view is an important theoretical contribution, and is not uncommon, but there is still a flaw in the argument. In her opinion, Zhu Guangqian's argument lacks intrinsic logic, and in the middle course of the problem, he tries to synthesize them, and the result can only conceal the contradictions.

Scholars Chaningsun that Zhu Guangqian is not a "negation of art and society, art and political relations of the people." Zhu Guangqian's aesthetic thought took place a major change in the 50 's. In the early period, Zhu Guangqian learned to accept the influence of Kant and Croce's idealism, and thought that aesthetic and literary activities were "surreal, super utilitarian", and that literary activities and all utilitarian activities were relatively upright. In the later period, Zhu Guangqian began to criticize the defects of formal aesthetics consciously, and had a change in the relationship between literature and morality, and criticized the slogan of "Art for Art".

In addition, Chaningsun analyzes the contradictions between Zhu Guangqian and the left-wing literary movement in the 1930s, and the left-wing thinks that Zhu Guangqian's many literary propositions are attacks on revolutionary literature and art. He also discusses how literature and art can exert moral influence with their own unique character, this paper focuses on the influence of Zhu Guangqian's "immoral and moral influence" on Kant's "aimless and purposeful" viewpoint, and points out that Zhu Guangqian insists on the independence of literature and art, and affirms the sociality of literature and art on the other hand.

The relationship between literature and morality has always been debated, and the two viewpoints of "artistic and artistic" and "art for Art" are at loggerheads. From Zhou Qin to the input of modern Western literary trend of thought, literature and art are regarded as the vassal of morality in China. This kind of thought is the expression of Chinese national nature, because the Chinese nation always attaches importance to practicality. From Confucius ' defending poems to later truth, people can clearly see the viewpoint of "art and Morality". In the West, the issue of the relationship between literature and morality is equally fierce. Plato was to drive the poet out of the Utopia, and Aristotle tried to defend the poem as the ancestor of artistic independence, and Tolstoy objected to "Art for Art", arguing that the purpose of art was to propagate morality and religion and not to create beauty.

In the author's opinion, the relationship between literature and morality is the unity of opposites, which influences each other and is inseparable. Literature and art is a special spiritual phenomenon of human society, a purposeful and conscious activity of people, and a creative activity. Morality is determined by a certain social and economic relationship, with the evaluation of good and evil as the standard, relying on the social public opinion, the traditional habit of maintaining the sum of the norms of conduct.

Both art and morality are important components of human civilization, and they are interdependent and inseparable. Art exists in social life, has sociality, can not be free from moral or contrary to the development of morality. Morality can guide and influence the development of art, but it must not make art become the vassal of morality and lose the independence of art.

Art is not a tool of morality, nor is morality a servant of art. They complement each other and develop harmoniously. Through artistic activities, human beings transmit culture, thought and morals, so that the social members can be liberated in the artistic activities, the soul is communicated, and the whole society develops harmoniously. At the same time, art itself is social, can not deviate from the moral and arbitrary development, art and ethics to develop together, mutual promotion.

As two different forms of social consciousness, literature and art have their own characteristics and differences, but this does not affect the interaction and interaction between them.

On the one hand, art affects morality. Any art works are done in a certain era and social background, so the art works must include social values and moral concepts. Although some works of art do not directly reflect the moral concept, but the art works are created by the artist, the artist lives in the society, and its value concept is bound to be influenced by the social moral concept at that time. Croce used the concepts of art and artists when discussing the relationship between literature and morality. Croce does not negate the fact that the artist is common in society as an ordinary person. First of all, there are moral concepts in literature and art.

The moral concept is embodied in every field of social life, whether it is political life, economic life or cultural life, it contains more or less moral value. Literature and art reflects social life, so literature and art can not involve certain social moral concepts. The moral value in human society is precisely the vitality and source of literary creation. Secondly, literature and art can give people a kind of invisible moral force. Literature and art are always compatible with certain moral values, and actively disseminate this moral concept, and teach people to accept. Many artists permeate and propagate some kind of moral concept in their own literary and artistic works, and the artistic recipients will be influenced by the artist's moral emotion imperceptibly in the art appreciation. Third, the unique charm of art attracts people, and makes the masses consciously become recipients. The basic characteristic of literature and art is the image and emotion, and the artistic image charm of literature and art has irreplaceable function in spreading the concept of moral value.

On the other hand, morality affects art. First, all works of art are created by artists, artist is a natural person living in society, each artist has its own outlook on life, world outlook, values, and so on, they will be in the art of artistic creation in the process of revealing their own moral concepts, and to make a corresponding moral evaluation of life. Second, the car Martini said, "Art comes from life, and higher than life", art is a reflection of real life, according to Croce's point of view "art is intuition", people intuition to an image, it has been in the heart of an art work. Whether it is in the heart of the creation of works of art or works of art is a certain social life in the artist's mind of the product. Therefore, literature and art must be integrated into the artist's personal subjective moral evaluation and moral judgment. Third, every class of the times will require literature and art to reflect and publicize their own moral concepts, especially a country's ruling class, but also regard literature and art as an important tool of moral education for members of the society. In this case, literature and art can properly serve the moral and promote certain moral values, but do not become the vassal and tool of morality.

In the process of the development of art and morals, they complement each other and develop harmoniously. Art cannot transcend or even develop against morality. The fact has proved that the development direction of "art for Art" is not normal, and the art of violating morality is not acceptable. The pursuit of blood, cruelty and violence of art has undoubtedly deviated from morality. Similarly, morality cannot regard art as its own vassal, the development of exploitation and oppression of art. In the postmodern society, everyone has a certain aesthetic ability, are the artists in life, have their own judgment standards and values. It is impossible for morality to kidnap art again, the aim of art education is to shape people's emotion, make people's feelings liberated, they only promote each other, harmonize with each other, and there will be a bright prospect of literature and morality.

The beauty of art and the goodness of morality are fused together, and beauty and goodness are inseparable and mutually promoted in the works of art. Art without moral value will appear feeble, become a useless thing, even to decadent, like the literature of "aestheticism." If the artistic work loses the moral implication, the work loses the spiritual prop and the thought strength, will not play the positive function to purifies the human mind, the guiding person's thought. Art without aesthetic value makes people feel boring, too much attention to their utilitarian value easily leads to art as a tool of morality. If the artistic work loses its esthetic value, the esthetic sense, then its own existence value also to be few.

In a word, in the relationship between literature and morality, the author opposes both literature and art as a vassal of morality, and does not agree with the idea of artistic independence "for art", and holds that both literature and art should be interdependent and harmonious. It is necessary to include moral value in art, such works can give people the shock of spirit and thought, the inheritance of generation, and the moral value should guide the development of art properly, so that the artistic value and aesthetic value of art works are higher, and the works of art are more attractive.

想要了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要论文代写，请关注51Due英国论文代写平台，51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构，专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作，主要业务有essay代写、paper代写、assignment代写。在这里，51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务，为广大留学生提升写作水平，帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有代写需求，可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。