r51due

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的essay代写范文- The Ways of Meeting Oppression，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了应对压迫的方式。马丁·路德·金在他的文章《应对压迫的方式》中提到了三种不同的处理压迫的方法，即顺从、暴力和非暴力抵抗。他建议人们应该采取非暴力的策略来避免任何错误。因为他认为非暴力抗议是对抗不公正的最好方式。

Martin Luther King mentions three different ways to deal with oppression in his article “The Ways of Meeting Oppression”, which are acquiescence, violence, and nonviolence resistance. Heclaims that people should take nonviolence strategies to avoid any wrong. Since he believes nonviolence protest is the best way to fight against injustice, he uses various rhetorical features including effective ethos, logos and pathos to prove his point of view and try to persuade the audience.

Martin Luther King makes emotional repetition to emphasize that acquiescence is the passive acceptance of negative freedom. Repetition has strong effects when the author means to reinforce his ideas. When King talks about the reason that acquiescence is not a good choice under oppression, he discusses about acquiescence with same phrases and words. In the third paragraph. King states that “to accept passively an unjust system is to cooperate with that system” and “to accept injustice or segregation passively is to say to the oppressor that his actions are morally right” (King 413). He also describes that acquiescence is “a way of allowing his conscience to fall asleep” and “a way of coward” (King 413). He criticizes acquiescence as the indulgence of injustice and blames the choice is giving up the opportunity to fight. Besides, King explains from the enemy side to convince people. He says “the Negro cannot win the respect of his oppressor…” and “the Negro cannot win the respect of the white people of the South…” to show the negative results and social influence caused by acquiescence. Those repeated phrases emotionally convey King’s attitude toward acquiescence.

Not only on the emotional level, King also provides a higher moral ground with logical arguments to show the immorality of violence and the importance of nonviolence. He analyzes that violence cannot solve the problem substantially because it is to humiliate and annihilate the enemy. He lists all the severe outcomes to illustrate how violence does harm to people, including the fragmentation of the whole society, the paradox of violence itself, and the negative effects to the future generation. King expects that nonviolence resistance can contribute to the moral strength of the country and praises it as a great example. It show nonviolence will influence the society positively in a long term without any inferior method. The explanation on the moral level logically denies the legitimacy and feasibility of violence resistance.

In addition, to highlight the advantage of nonviolence protest, King states shared values and makes contrast with the evidence accepted by people. He firstly clarifies the goal of their resistance, which is the fight between evil and good, justice and injustice. Then he analyzes the differences to make the advantages of nonviolence more obvious and clear. The choice of violence is on the edge of love and hatred, so there will be different result of hope or destruction. He points out that it should be the fight against oppression but not people, but violence can hurt more people. The use of common sense makes it close to the audience.

In conclusion, Martin Luther King uses various rhetorical strategies and impressive language to target the audience effectively. It is a touching article that pervades people both emotionally and logically, and has a lot of acceptable evidence.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创essay代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、美国作业代写服务。

51due为留学生提供最好的essay代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多essay代写范文 提供代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。