r51due

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的essay代写范文- The police system in Britain，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了英国的警察制度。英国是一个非常崇尚个人自由的国度，因此在权力运作及警务风格方面，形成了一种传统观念，即社会安全是公众自己的事情， 应该由自己来解决。警察既不可以过度集中也不可以军事化，否则就会威胁公众的基本权力和国家的民主生活。因此，从建警之日起，英国人就把警察视为维护社会治安及公共秩序的组织，将其区别于军队的力量。英国警察在风格上走亲民路线，非常重视警民关系。

The police organ, called the public security organ in China, as one of the important state organs, represents justice and uprightness. However, in recent years, the liqinghong case in guizhou province and the perjury case of four lawyers in beihai reflect to varying degrees the unrestrained side of public power. Article 73 of the amendment to criminal litigation, which was hotly discussed last year, has made public power squeeze private rights a public concern. The regulation of police power should protect, rather than weaken, citizens' "freedom from fear". The inversely proportional relationship between police power and civil rights urgently requires us to demarcate the boundary of police power through the system so as to achieve the harmonious coexistence of police power and civil rights.

When we were young, we used to call ourselves "uncle police", but now we hear about "the family of police and bandits". Lin fujiu's confession, the tragedy of wuhan student sun zhigang and the virgin whoring case of shaanxi girl ma dandan all shocked us. There are many other horrific cases of vicious police. In daily life, living outside the hotel, someone rushed in to check wanted criminals, they are the police; Come home from work to see someone invade, leaving only a search warrant and witness signatures, they are also police. It seems that the police name has become a passport to the private sphere, so where is our privacy?

Aristotle once asserted, "it is strange to say that all men who have power are apt to abuse it. It is an unchangeable experience throughout the ages." Deng xiaoping once summed up profoundly: "the system problem is more fundamental, overall, long-term and stable. A good system can prevent the bad guys from running amok at will, while a bad system can prevent the good guys from doing enough good deeds and even lead to the opposite. "On this basis, for the exercise of police rights, we can not only boil down to the police's lack of personal accomplishment, but also from the system to find loopholes.

Britain is a country that advocates individual freedom, so in terms of power operation and police style, a traditional concept has been formed: social security is the business of the public and should be solved by itself. The police should neither be overly centralized nor militarized, which would threaten the basic rights of the public and the democratic life of the country. Therefore, from the day of the establishment of the police, the British regarded the police as an organization to maintain social security and public order, and distinguished it from the force of the army. British police do not have military ranks, do not wear weapons, unified tuxedo uniform, which shows that the British police in the style of the pro-civilian line, attaches importance to the relationship between the police and the people.

In terms of decentralization, the UK implements an inverted triangle management system of decentralization between central and local authorities. The police business is under the jurisdiction of the home office, and the central authority is directly in charge of the London regional police station. Other areas are managed by local police committees and police stations. The police commission is made up of local judges, celebrities and heads of government departments, and is chaired by a retired police chief. The police committee is only responsible for the budget and the appointment and removal of the chief of police, and the other work is managed by the police department. This system of self-determination, though smacking of the sole authority of the police chief, has clarified the powers and powers of the police chief, making him the first person responsible for public security and avoiding the problem of prevarication. The unity of power and responsibility is the guarantee of the legitimate operation of power, so the police power in our country should be clear about the specific responsibility attribution in the operation.

In short, the prominent characteristics of the British police system are that it attaches great importance to the protection of civil rights, the accountability system, the performance and the affinity for the people, which are also the deficiencies of the current police system in China. There are many drawbacks in the current police system in China, such as abuse of power and rent-seeking, blurring of power boundaries and boundary crossing, and illegal and illegal exercise of power.

Lord acton's aphorism: "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Justice holmes of the United States also said, "criminals who escape the law are less guilty than those who commit illegal ACTS by the government." It can be seen that the abuse of police power has a wider range of harm and more serious consequences.

The inverted triangle management model of the British police authority and the police chief responsibility system reflect the idea that "power must have responsibility and power is limited". Therefore, we can try to establish a relatively independent institution, the police supervision committee, and try our best to ensure the neutrality of the police supervision committee. In this regard, we can follow the example of the Hong Kong police oversight board, which is composed of members of the public to ensure that their actions are not disturbed by members of the police force. The ipcc is responsible for the supervision and re-inspection of complaints, pointing out loopholes in the police work procedures, and combining with other means of social supervision, such as public supervision and media supervision, gradually establishing an effective control system.

All dynasties in China established the autocratic family world through war and violence, and then imposed both morality and punishment to achieve the goal of universal submission. Such a political environment filled with violent content makes the traditional Chinese police system show strong military characteristics. The British police system pursues demilitarization and attaches importance to the relationship between the police and the people, which makes the identity of the British police more intimate. Compared with the UK, Chinese people have long been troubled by the mentality of "talking about the police and turning pale", and the gap between the two has greatly reduced the credibility of the police in the public psychology. Therefore, it is urgent to establish a civilian police system in China. It is necessary for the police to establish a sense of responsibility to protect people's property and life safety. In practice, it is necessary to improve the education system of the police to achieve the goal. The current situation of police management in China is to "emphasize selection and neglect education", so that a large number of police have a significant decline in professional ethics after entering the job. Therefore, we must improve the regular assessment and learning system of the police after entry, and focus on the education relationship between the police and the people, so as to realize the demilitarization of the police force.

As for the division between administrative police and judicial police, Japanese scholars believe that there are differences in nature between them, while French scholars believe that there are only differences in responsibilities and authorities between them. In our country these two kinds of police power belong to the public security organs, just belong to different departments. Bailiffs are similar in name to judicial police, but their function is only to ensure the smooth proceeding of litigation activities, so it is not within the scope of this paper. The distinction between administrative police and judicial police is the distinction between police public security management administrative power and criminal investigation power. In recent years, the phenomenon that public security organs equate the right of public security inspection with the right of criminal search in law enforcement has aroused a heated discussion on the protection of human rights. Public security procuratorial power and criminal search power should have clear boundaries, but to distinguish between public and private areas to discuss. At present, the prevailing view is that the public security inspection should focus on ensuring the efficiency of police law enforcement and the application of loose legal control, while the private sector should be strictly controlled by law to better protect civil rights. According to this, many countries divide the police into administrative police and judicial police, while China has not yet made a distinction.

According to professor Chen xingliang, the current police power in China has three characteristics: namely, the police power is monopolized by the public security organs. Police power exists in every aspect of life. Police power involves the personal and property rights of citizens and can be deprived under certain circumstances, so it is a very important power. Under the trend of the economic system transformation in our country, the inevitable appeared a peak of crime, the police is more important, so in the short term trend of police power not possible power, may expand instead, want to be in this situation, to realize the balance of public rights and private rights, can only classify the police, to make it changed, weaken the power expansion trend, and efficient law enforcement at the same time.

想要了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要英国代写，请关注51Due英国论文代写平台，51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构，专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作，主要业务有essay代写、paper代写、assignment代写。在这里，51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务，为广大留学生提升写作水平，帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有essay代写需求，可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。

51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有；未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象，51Due保留一切法律追诉权。