r51due

本篇paper代写- A discussion of the First Emperor of Qin and his Empire讨论了秦朝。秦朝是中国历史上第一个实现统一的朝代，而秦始皇是这个朝代的第一个皇帝。他的行动、政策和措施都具有一定的历史意义。然而，秦朝随着反抗其统治的叛乱分子的崛起，它也经历了迅速的衰落。本篇paper代写由51due代写平台整理，供大家参考阅读。

Qin Dynasty is the first dynasty in the Chinese history to achieve the unity, and the First Emperor of Qin is the first emperor of the dynasty. His actions, policies, and measures have a certain historical significance. However, it also experienced a quick fall with the rising of rebels against its rule. The success and later fall of Qin can explained by a lot of factors and attract many filmmakers to present it in some artistic form.

What distinguished the First Emperor of Qin with others was his bold vision and correct strategies, but his cruel and grandiose characteristic constitute his major flaws. The First Emperor of Qin dared to make a strategic decision to destroy the six countries. At that time, the First Emperor of Qin faced two choices: without destroying the six countries, his country can be free of wars and flourishing; destroying the six countries unified the country. In such a historical turning point, if people in the status of decision-making decide improperly, it often makes a country move towards the demise. The First Emperor of Qin on this issue of the reunification was rather decisive. In the war against six countries, reward and punishment was strictly in accordance with the meritorious service, which has been implemented since the reform of Shang Yang and is one of various factors for final victory of Qin dynasty.  In the Records of the Grand Historian, Wang Jian said that“Though many of Your Majesty’s generals have achieved merit”(Suggested by Wing Suen, 1). This policy was to attract everyone to play their own maximum energy on the battlefield. The whole country were running more efficiently with the forming of bureaucratization. Military competition and war make states to use better bureaucratic form( Kiser, and Yong, 512). The reason why this system is powerful is that it is the basic form of property and power redistribution of the state. The actual interests of people at all levels are the rewards of land, distribution of taxation and the promotion of personal status and so on. There was huge tax levied upon the Qin people(Dull,  291). Also, the First Emperor of Qin liked to boast his great achievement, which lead to a large consumption and waste of national strength. There were a lot of accusation against the Qin dynasty in terms of huge mobilization of civilians for military purpose and for construction(Dull, 286). After the war, despite the reality that the Qin Dynasty lack of material, and people were sparse, there was a lot of hard work, and a series of vast projects. The building of the ancient Great Wall means the enrolling of people in large-scale corvee, and military service.

In addition to the personal factors of the First Emperor of Qin, the establishment of the feudal unity of the Qin and the establishment of the centralized state was the product of the feudal economic movement. A lot of administrative measures lasted more than two thousand years(Kiser,and Yong, 512 ).The Qin dynasty built by the First Emperor of Qin is the most essential and general manifestation of the feudal unity of centralization. Unified centralization was more favorable to the landlord class, especially for the looting and oppression of the monarch on the peasants. The stronger the centralization of feudalism before the peasants were united, the more favorable for the landlord class to slaughter the scattered peasants.nThe implementation of the centralization system makes for the establishment of a universal standard. The First Emperor of Qin thus made for the building of a series of universal standards in the various areas of economical sectors. For example, Prime Minister Li Si advocated standard weights and measure units across the Qin Empire(ancient-china-history.com, 2017). The Qin Dynasty used “banliang,” as the single currency. This should be conducive to economic and cultural exchanges, and is of great significance especially for the development of business. But the First Emperor of Qin was to control the people's freedom of immigration and flow with a strong centralized and strict institution. Also, the building of a universal writing system is in line with the law of cultural and economic development, but the character is, after all, only a tool of communication, and cultural content has a wide range of content than that. Also, the subjects were required to learn the knowledge related to law, which is not good for the development of culture, but to stifle culture. His burning of book related to Confucianism and killing of people who believed in and practiced Confucianism more than ten years. All those measures are almost all said to measures made by the the First Emperor of Qin for anti-splitting, and safeguarding unity. But they also became authoritarian tools for the emperor of feudal culture .

To sum up, the First Emperor of Qin was a conflicting historical figure. He unified China after the adoption of a series of policies, measures and activities, some of which are in line with the law of historical development, while others violate the law of historical development, which was undermining social basis for the implementation of those correct policies. Because some of the activities of the Qin emperor to a certain extent reflected the inevitability of the history. The building of a series of universal standards is good for the economic and cultural exchanges and development, so these measures are historical heritage for people to inherit, but some of became too extreme. The First Emperor of Qin established the centralized feudal system, which is a reflection of the interests of the landlord class, but the subsequent peasant uprising repeatedly disrupted it.

Works  Cited

ancient-china-history.com.(2017).“Qin Dynasty: The First of Imperial Rulers”. http://www.ancient-china-history.com/qin-dynasty.html

Dull, Jack L. “Anti-Qin Rebels: No Peasant Leaders Here.” Modern China, vol. 9, no. 3, 1983, pp. 285–318., www.jstor.org/stable/188992.

Kiser, Edgar, and Yong Cai. “War and Bureaucratization in Qin China: Exploring an Anomalous Case.” American Sociological Review, vol. 68, no. 4, 2003, pp. 511–539., www.jstor.org/stable/1519737.

Suggested by Wing Suen. “Signaling in the Qin Dynasty.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 116, no. 1, 2008, pp.1 Back Cover-Back Cover., www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/587817.

要想成绩好，英国论文得写好，51due代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯，专业辅导，还为你提供专业英国essay代写，paper代写，report代写，需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due工作客服QQ：800020041或者Wechat：Abby0900吧。