黎巴嫩和叙利亚的冲突-英国论文代写－r51due

英国essay论文精选范文：“黎巴嫩和叙利亚的冲突”，这篇论文讨论了黎巴嫩和叙利亚的冲突。1940年，法国败降后引起了叙利亚和黎巴嫩形势的变化，严重威胁了英国委任统治地的安全，为此，1941年6月，英国与自由法国联合占领了叙利亚和黎巴嫩，从而也拉开了其在这里冲突的序幕。此间英法在叙利亚和黎巴嫩的冲突集中在叙利亚和黎巴嫩的独立，还有军用物资的归属。

After the fall of France, the newly established Vichy government to German anti-British as the basis of foreign policy and Germany signed the German-French armistice agreement, and reached an agreement to ensure that the Vichy government will support the scope of its ability to support the axis In order to prevent the support of the Allies and Free France to the British and free France, the French colonial authorities disbanded the troops in Syria, and the dissolution of the army officers and soldiers back to their own Of the territory, there is no time to get back to the personnel to be taken care of this way, the French pre-war in Syria has assembled more than 120,000 people, after the fall of 1940, only about 35,000 people as the planned Allied forces of the French Army and its employment The French Vichy government according to the armistice agreement to the German and Italian Commission under the jurisdiction of 1940 August, the Italian officers arrived in Beirut, on behalf of the axis of the country oversees Armistice After the Italian Armistice Commission, German spies came to Syria, starting with Beirut Metropolitan Hotel as a base for the German control of the two countries by holding a reception to show Germany's promo and a series of visits But also the use of Syria to facilitate the convenience of the United Kingdom to support the activities of the judiciary, so that Syria as the axis of the Middle East anti-British base its outstanding performance is: May 1941 Germany to use Syria to facilitate Iraqi Rashid Ali's anti- British coup In fact, the German and Italian Commission has been under the Vichy government appointed by the joint management of the two authorities of the Syrian colonies, Syria and France fell into the French and German commission under the dual control of the appointment of authorities.

In addition, during the French Mandate, the nationalists of Syria and Lebanon have been making unremitting efforts for independence, but until the outbreak of World War II, France did not conclude Syria and Syria treaty, and in order to imminent world war Turkey To the Anglo-French Union side, in 1939 also Alexandre Lita ceded to Turkey, so that France has no credit in Syria after the French defeat, the arrival of the German agents to incite extremists in the protracted Palestinian issue, in the axis The United States asserted that Britain had allowed the transfer of northern Syria to Turkey as an issue of friendly price, against the British.

Thus putting Britain on the opposite side of the Syrian people and shaping Germany as the emancipator of the Middle East. Hitler's Instruction No. 30 states that the victory of the Axis will liberate the Middle East countries from British slavery and gain self-determination. Freedom should join the front against the British. Syria and Lebanon's nationalists began to test the prospect of independence through Germany, Syria appeared to support the momentum of the situation in Lebanon, Syria, the situation changes, endangering the nationalist who has been unsuccessful for the independence of Syria and Lebanon to bring a ray of light, To the interests of Britain in the Middle East, while the newly established freedom of France would like to re-occupation of Syria and Lebanon, so the United Kingdom and Liberal France jointly attacked Syria and Lebanon.

http://www.51due.net/writing/essay/sample31004.html

The independence of Syria and Lebanon is the most important issue in the conflict between France and Freedom France. Before the attack on Syria, Freedom France realized that it was only on the basis of recognizing the political independence of Syria and Lebanon and establishing an alliance with them. After the status of the Eastern Mediterranean.

So in April 1941, Charles de Gaulle issued a statement to prepare for the independence and sovereignty of the Syrian region Churchill on this issue in the June 6 to de Gaulle, said: welcome to allow the independence of Syria and Lebanon and the British made the decision to allow such permission It is also important to provide adequate assurance. When the French High Commissioner Judd was proposing the independence of Syria and Lebanon, the British Government demanded that it be co-sponsored by the United Kingdom and Freedom France and suggested that this guarantee should appear in the text, but that the de Gaulle's promise in France did not require foreign guarantees The reason was rejected. Subsequently, the British and the Free France issued a declaration of independence of Syria and Lebanon. Although Charles de Gaulle acknowledged that the independence of Syria and Lebanon would be proclaimed and respected, the prerequisite was a treaty with them to solemnly guarantee the rights and special interests of France, On the contrary, on 19 June 1941, Lampen addressed Aydin and told him that Freedom France would guarantee France's position in the Eastern Mediterranean region in the context of their independence from Syria and Lebanon as allowed by Great Britain. . Britain stressed that the premise of guaranteeing the independence of Syria, France in the Eastern Mediterranean position can guarantee, while the free France has stressed the prerogative of France's privileges, Syria and Lebanon to get independent British and free France on the issue of conflict continued until 1943 Syria independence in years.

Although the United Kingdom has repeatedly reaffirmed that the Allies, in addition to not allowing Syria to be used as an enemy to attack their positions in the Middle East, the Syrians do nothing but the free French people think that the above-mentioned British desire to create an impression, Independence is the power of the British, the purpose is to establish leadership throughout the Middle East, so the freedom of the French strongly refused to allow the British to encroach on anything in Syria and Lebanon, but the number of free French less, and completely dependent on the British material, so they can not like As desired, to take all jurisdictions completely independently. Eventually forced to establish a form of co-step step by step although Jia Delu want to establish a pro-French independence through Syria and Lebanon to reverse this situation, on September 27, 1941 and November 26, respectively, announced the independence of Syria and Lebanon, But the French forces in Syria and Lebanon can no longer recover less than the pre-war situation.

After the defeat of France, in Syria left a large part of strategic materials, and soon the Italians came to Syria, and the stockpiling of munitions for storage and proper handling of Iraq in May 1941 when Rashid Ali coup, Syria Li's Axis Council decided to expropriate French supplies that had been in Syria since the truce and decided to ship three quarters of the munitions to Syria, which were held by the Italian Armistice Commission, to Iraq. But the Rahid Ali's coup soon failed, from Syria to Iraq's military supplies is also limited when the Allies attack Syria, where the material has become the object of the British and free France in the negotiation of the handling of military supplies, Freedom of France proposed that war supplies should be handed over to allies, which obviously included free France, but Lampson, in de Gaulle, thought they had to take steps to prevent the use of war supplies in Syria to attack them, so the supplies should be intact. To them. And in the July 14 armistice agreement in accordance with the implementation of London Free French representatives quickly protested and demanded that the distribution of military supplies of the serious damage to the interests of the free French military requirements of the British apparently asked to transfer over Part of the military supplies transferred to the free French army. De Gaulle and decided to take possession of all material wherever it was discovered. When the conflict reached such a level, the two sides negotiated an interpretative agreement establishing that the military property was also the property of France, and that the Free French Command would The Middle East preferred the use of the material freedom of the French command will be based on the agreement with the British High Command; recently can not use the material to the British command to dominate in order to establish the necessary reserves, free France found that the use of this material can be restored ownership. Britain and Freedom France finally reached a co-management agreement, so that cooperation in the Middle East can be carried on.

During the First World War the British military occupied most of the fertile crescent of the Middle East, including part of today's Syria, France occupied only from Lebanon to the north of Lebanon to the west of Syria, Western coastal areas for objective reasons, the British intends to compromise with France, At the San Remo meeting in 1920, Syria was assigned to France, but almost all the French in the area and many others in France had a suspicion of Britain's suspicion that the British attempted to take them from there A region to get rid of. During World War II, the Commonwealth-based Allied occupation of Syria deepened the suspicion of free French, although Britain has repeatedly stressed that there is no territorial attempt on Syria. However, the free French people think that Britain is engaged in a conspiracy, is to use the opportunity of the defeat of France for the possession of Syria, of course, many British officers and men do themselves as Syria and Lebanon's liberators so whether in the collection of Vichy forces, Li independence, the freedom of France are trying to show that they are Syria and Lebanon masters of identity, only they have the right to give Syria independent but signed an agreement and order maintenance cannot be separated from the British support, the conflict followed

France has always believed that France has a historic mission of spreading civilizations to the countries of the Near East In order to achieve this goal, France has been dominated by direct rule in the colonies. Although the situation in Syria is constantly changing due to the situation in France itself and the world as a whole The French policy in Syria, whether before the fall of France, in the Vichy period or under the rule of free France, have not changed. Britain and France, since 1920, the United Kingdom has made concessions to the Arab national movement, to try to ensure that the British their own strategic and economic interests, lead it along the sound administrative organization of the road so although the free France before the attack on Syria But France still reluctant to give up the interests of Syria, the United Kingdom has asked the French interests should be to Syria as an independent guarantee, similar to its Iraq-Iraqi treaty with Iraq, which is France's long-term strategy is to contradictory.

The Middle East as an important strategic rear base of France, after the defeat of France, Syria was used to help the axis of the country to carry out activities, which in the British Middle East strategic defense online ripped a gap, if the axis of occupation of Syria, Turkey, the threat to Egypt south of Egypt, in addition to Syria's nationalists have been the tendency of the German fascist momentum After the Allies to seize Syria, in order to consolidate the Middle East base, the British hope with the regional governments and peoples to maintain maximum harmony, To recognize the independence of Syria and Lebanon in an attempt to appease the mild nationalist in the nick of strategic situation, so that the tendency of the axis of the trend of change, and France to maximize the maintenance of French forces to expand their own strength and strive for an equal footing with the United Kingdom Of the concept is clearly a conflict

Freedom France is the deceased after the death of Charles de Gaulle in exile in Britain to establish its survival and activities, purely rely on the British asylum and material support to launch the Near East Campaign, the Commonwealth forces much more than the free France, but in the Near East , Free France is required to inherit all pre-war France appointed power, for which it should strive for more personnel, access to more supplies, which is the first British to safeguard their own security principles is clearly inconsistent

In short, the British and free France in Syria and Lebanon of the conflict, regardless of Syria and Lebanon independence issue, or military property ownership issues are driven by egoism, to make the initiative or passive choice for Syria, the two countries argue Syria and Lebanon on the issue, but not the participation of Syria and Lebanon government, in nature, this is a tort, so in this conflict of interest, no matter who wins and who is unfair to Syria and Lebanon On the other hand, it is precisely because of the conflict between Britain and Freedom France that Syria would have a chance to get rid of the French Mandate earlier and realize the desire for independence in 1943

想要了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要英文作业代写，请关注51Due英国论文代写平台，51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构，专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作，主要业务有英国硕士论文代写、Essay代写、paper代写、assignment代写、英国finance论文指导。在这里，51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务，为广大留学生提升写作水平，帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有论文代写需求，可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。